aleksandr.urakov added a subscriber: leonid.mashinskiy. aleksandr.urakov added a comment.
In D67954#1680536 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D67954#1680536>, @labath wrote: > Have you considered going the "native" route directly? My understanding is > that this route is already functional on x86 (modulo watchpoints, which I > need to get around to reviewing). It would be great to be able to delete the > in-process route soon, as it's not good to have both for a long time, and for > that we need to ensure that the lldb-server route does not lag behind in > features. I'm not really sure what's needed to enable the lldb-server > mechanism, but @aleksandr.urakov should. Hello! I'm just commenting out content of the `ProcessWindows::Initialize()` function to use the `lldb-server` route. There are several problems with cross-debugging on Windows now, @leonid.mashinskiy got deep into this. Leonid, can you explain the difficulties, please? Repository: rLLDB LLDB CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION https://reviews.llvm.org/D67954/new/ https://reviews.llvm.org/D67954 _______________________________________________ lldb-commits mailing list lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits
