labath added a comment. In D64546#1580618 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D64546#1580618>, @friss wrote:
> This might mitigate the issue, but timeouts like this are bound to fail in > some circumstances (machine load, ...). It's more work, but can we instead > have the inferior produce an observable side effect (eg, print some output) > and synchronize on this? There's a `lldbutil.wait_for_file_on_target`, which was created exactly for this purpose. Repository: rLLDB LLDB CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION https://reviews.llvm.org/D64546/new/ https://reviews.llvm.org/D64546 _______________________________________________ lldb-commits mailing list lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits
