friss added a comment. This might mitigate the issue, but timeouts like this are bound to fail in some circumstances (machine load, ...). It's more work, but can we instead have the inferior produce an observable side effect (eg, print some output) and synchronize on this?
Repository: rLLDB LLDB CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION https://reviews.llvm.org/D64546/new/ https://reviews.llvm.org/D64546 _______________________________________________ lldb-commits mailing list lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits
