labath added a comment. In D63591#1553757 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D63591#1553757>, @dblaikie wrote:
> Given figuring out error handling for DataExtractor is perhaps a wider issue > - if you want to go ahead with this change (continue with the review & defer > error handling improvements for later, leave a FIXME, etc) that seems fine. How about this ? Theoretically I could also back out the SavedOffset changes. The main thing I was trying to fix is the stderr messages, this is just something I found while trying to write tests for the error handling code. I'm not too worried about the extra "zero" location lists being reported, as those are unlikely to be valid (but it would definitely be nice to fix them). I also have a kind of a WIP patch for doing the error handling in a better way. I'm going to put that up separately so we can discuss it there. PS: I'm going to have about two more patches here to make this stuff usable from lldb. Repository: rL LLVM CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION https://reviews.llvm.org/D63591/new/ https://reviews.llvm.org/D63591 _______________________________________________ lldb-commits mailing list lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits
