JDevlieghere added inline comments.
================
Comment at: source/Plugins/SymbolFile/DWARF/DWARFUnit.h:148
dw_addr_t GetStrOffsetsBase() const { return m_str_offsets_base; }
+ dw_offset_t GetLineTableOffset();
void SetAddrBase(dw_addr_t addr_base);
----------------
Nit: move this next to `GetAbbrevOffset`
================
Comment at: source/Plugins/SymbolFile/DWARF/DWARFUnit.h:200
const lldb_private::FileSpec &GetCompilationDirectory();
+ const lldb_private::FileSpec &GetFileSpec();
lldb_private::FileSpec::Style GetPathStyle();
----------------
Given the implementation, how about `GetAbsolutePath`? I think the "FileSpec"
of a DWARF unit is a little weird, but feel free to ignore this.
================
Comment at: source/Plugins/SymbolFile/DWARF/DWARFUnit.h:290
dw_offset_t m_str_offsets_base = 0; // Value of DW_AT_str_offsets_base.
+ dw_offset_t m_line_table_offset =
+ DW_INVALID_OFFSET; // Value of DW_AT_stmt_list.
----------------
Let's make this a Doxygen comment with `///<` or even better just `///` on the
line above it so it doesn't wrap.
================
Comment at: source/Plugins/SymbolFile/DWARF/SymbolFileDWARF.cpp:821
+ if (iter_bool.second) {
+ list.Append(FileSpec());
+ DWARFDebugLine::ParseSupportFiles(GetObjectFile()->GetModule(),
----------------
Not your responsibility but we should really get rid of this thing as it
doesn't make sense anymore in > DWARF5.
================
Comment at: source/Plugins/SymbolFile/DWARF/SymbolFileDWARF.h:303
+ lldb_private::FileSpec GetSupportFile(DWARFUnit &unit, size_t file_idx);
+
----------------
clayborg wrote:
> Can probably just be named GetFile
Should this return an optional?
CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
https://reviews.llvm.org/D62894/new/
https://reviews.llvm.org/D62894
_______________________________________________
lldb-commits mailing list
lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits
