labath added a comment. It looks like this test is flaky: http://lab.llvm.org:8014/builders/lldb-x86_64-debian/builds/1339/steps/test/logs/stdio http://lab.llvm.org:8014/builders/lldb-x86_64-debian/builds/1294/steps/test/logs/stdio
The failure messages I've seen are all the same and seem to indicate that the "breakpoint locations added" and "process stopped" messages come out of order. This seems plausible since the two messages are reported through different channels, and I was able to reproduce this failure locally by adding a sleep(1) to Debugger::HandleBreakpointEvent. Given that the behavior of asynchronous breakpoint location messages is not the puprose of this test, what would you say to just deleting the "# CHECK: 1 location added to breakpoint 1" line from the test? Repository: rL LLVM CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION https://reviews.llvm.org/D61611/new/ https://reviews.llvm.org/D61611 _______________________________________________ lldb-commits mailing list lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits
