JDevlieghere added a comment.

In the future please include context with the diff (-U9999 should do the 
trick), it makes reviewing a lot easier.

Have you considered wrapping raw strings in llvm's `StringRef`s? It looks like 
lldb-mi is already using some ADT classes from llvm. 
Unfortunately we cannot use those in the SB interface, but they're a lot safer. 
They have a `.str()` which does the right thing and returns an empty string 
when the raw string is a `nullptr`. Personally I would very much prefer that 
over the `This.or(That)` pattern, but if you really wanted that you could have 
an Optional<StringRef> and do `getValueOr()` as Shafik suggested.


CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
  https://reviews.llvm.org/D55653/new/

https://reviews.llvm.org/D55653



_______________________________________________
lldb-commits mailing list
lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits

Reply via email to