> On May 22, 2018, at 6:57 PM, Zachary Turner <ztur...@google.com> wrote: > > Yea I don’t think this addresses the problem. We should be able to link > against parts of lldb without a dependency on clang. Since this is about > configuring something related to clang, it seems like it should be isolated > to some part of lldb that interfaces with clang
And this is the point where I need some help :-) The intended layering of LLDB is not at all clear to me. Which LLDB libraries are allowed to link against clang? Do we have a diagram somewhere? -- adrian _______________________________________________ lldb-commits mailing list lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits
