aemerson added a comment.

In https://reviews.llvm.org/D46889#1104823, @aprantl wrote:

> Thanks for jumping on this Amara — I just wanted to point out that we 
> ususally don't revert lldb changes that only break the lldb-xcode bot if they 
> pass on the lldb-cmake bot at the same time. When this happens it usually 
> means that the lldb Xcode project must be updated and it's too much to ask 
> from all open source contributors to get access to a machine running Xcode to 
> do this. Instead one of the Apple LLDB developers usually goes in and updates 
> the Xcode project for them.
>
> - adrian


Ah ok. Does that include cases like this one with the link error:

  Undefined symbols for architecture x86_64:
    "lldb_private::AppleDWARFIndex::Create(lldb_private::Module&, 
lldb_private::DWARFDataExtractor, lldb_private::DWARFDataExtractor, 
lldb_private::DWARFDataExtractor, lldb_private::DWARFDataExtractor, 
lldb_private::DWARFDataExtractor)", referenced from:
        SymbolFileDWARF::InitializeObject() in liblldb-core.a(SymbolFileDWARF.o)
    "vtable for lldb_private::ManualDWARFIndex", referenced from:
        SymbolFileDWARF::InitializeObject() in liblldb-core.a(SymbolFileDWARF.o)
    NOTE: a missing vtable usually means the first non-inline virtual member 
function has no definition.


Repository:
  rL LLVM

https://reviews.llvm.org/D46889



_______________________________________________
lldb-commits mailing list
lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org
http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits

Reply via email to