JDevlieghere marked an inline comment as done. JDevlieghere added a comment.
In https://reviews.llvm.org/D47062#1104558, @davide wrote: > Can you commit the whitespace fixes separately? Sure. ================ Comment at: packages/Python/lldbsuite/test/dosep.py:122 print("[%s FAILED]%s" % (name, timeout_str), file=sys.stderr) - print("Command invoked: %s" % ' '.join(command), file=sys.stderr) + print("Reproduce with: lldb-dotest -f {}".format(name), file=sys.stderr) update_progress(name) ---------------- aprantl wrote: > What do you think about adding the full path to lldb-dotest? I usually have > at least three concurrent checkouts of lldb at any time. Me too, but how would we get that information here? On of `lldb-dotest`'s goals is that you can execute it from anywhere, so you'd either have to pass it explicitly to `dotest.py` (either using a custom argument and cmake variable combo, or by assuming it lives in the same directory as the current lldb and appending `-dotest`) but that feels like it might not be worth it. Maybe there's another solution you had in mind? Repository: rL LLVM https://reviews.llvm.org/D47062 _______________________________________________ lldb-commits mailing list lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits