Llvm also separates the Integration tests (test-suite) from the regression tests. That’s another approach to handling the Cartesian product testing On Mon, Feb 26, 2018 at 6:01 PM Paul Robinson via Phabricator via lldb-commits <lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org> wrote:
> probinson added a comment. > > In https://reviews.llvm.org/D32167#1020032, @labath wrote: > > > Running the entire dotest test suite in -fdebug-types-section is > certainly a good way to catch problems, but it's not the way to write > regression tests. > > > Is there testing in place that is more serious/thorough than the normal > regression testing? It might be reasonable to do the full cartesian set at > a slower pace. For example LLVM has the concept of "expensive checks" and > there are a small number of bots out there that enable them. But it's not > something anybody runs normally. > > > https://reviews.llvm.org/D32167 > > > > _______________________________________________ > lldb-commits mailing list > lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org > http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits >
_______________________________________________ lldb-commits mailing list lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits
