jingham added a comment.

Right now, which tests are "run all variants" is represents more history than 
policy.  Opt out of all variants is opt in, and while I at least kick out 
obvious tests that don't really need to run all variants when I touch them, but 
I don't think we have done a careful audit.  I think the general idea of 
running variants is good, but we really should reduce the number of tests we 
run this way to the ones that actually test things that might break that way.

Note, I have (though very very occasionally) seen a dsymutil bug that broke 
line tables.  So it would be good to keep a few "set a breakpoint and run to 
it" tests just to sanity check this.  But most tests that just run somewhere 
and print a backtrace or view an integer variable or such-like do not need to 
run all variants.


https://reviews.llvm.org/D32167



_______________________________________________
lldb-commits mailing list
lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org
http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits

Reply via email to