On 9 January 2018 at 15:26, Davide Italiano <dccitali...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Tue, Jan 9, 2018 at 5:02 AM, Pavel Labath <lab...@google.com> wrote: >> The inheritance trick can be useful sometimes, but I don't think it's >> a good way to write tests in general (and it should not be necessary >> for this patch). >> >> I assume you ran into this while working on a real-world bug. How were >> the relevant ArchSpecs constructed there? The class is fairly simple, >> so it should be easy to replicate the construction here (probably just >> involves passing the correct triple string to the ArchSpec >> constructor)... >> >> Did you try that approach? >> > > Yes, I did. This is for a non-public triple but still wanted some > coverage of the behavior upstream.
Ah, I see. Thanks for the explanation. _______________________________________________ lldb-commits mailing list lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits
