On Tue, Jan 9, 2018 at 5:02 AM, Pavel Labath <lab...@google.com> wrote: > The inheritance trick can be useful sometimes, but I don't think it's > a good way to write tests in general (and it should not be necessary > for this patch). > > I assume you ran into this while working on a real-world bug. How were > the relevant ArchSpecs constructed there? The class is fairly simple, > so it should be easy to replicate the construction here (probably just > involves passing the correct triple string to the ArchSpec > constructor)... > > Did you try that approach? >
Yes, I did. This is for a non-public triple but still wanted some coverage of the behavior upstream. Thanks! -- Davide _______________________________________________ lldb-commits mailing list lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits
