Microsoft Visual C++ first comes to my mind. On Mon, Apr 24, 2017 at 2:31 PM, Zachary Turner <ztur...@google.com> wrote:
> Which C compilers do we have that are not capable of producing ELF > binaries? GCC on Windows maybe? That's not even a supported test > configuration. > > On Mon, Apr 24, 2017 at 2:29 PM Pavel Labath via Phabricator < > revi...@reviews.llvm.org> wrote: > >> labath added a comment. >> >> In https://reviews.llvm.org/D32434#735877, @eugene wrote: >> >> > Is it really necessary to check in binary ELF files? >> > I understand that we don't always have a C compiler capable of >> producing ELF files, but maybe it's ok to skip this test on those platforms. >> >> >> That is something very I am very much trying to avoid, as that means >> people on those platforms cannot validate their changes. (And I'm not sure >> if I even want to be running a compiler for a test at this level, as that >> introduces a level of nondeterminism.) >> >> That said, I do agree we should be carefully about adding lots of binary >> bloat. I have been trying to put this off until we have more of these, but >> maybe I could try integrating this with obj2yaml -- it does not seem to >> preserve program headers, but I don't actually need those for this test. >> >> >> https://reviews.llvm.org/D32434 >> >> >> >> -- Thanks, Eugene Zemtsov.
_______________________________________________ lldb-commits mailing list lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits
