DavidSpickett wrote: Looks good to me, but -
Is this going to also solve the lldb-server problem you observed, or do you have a follow up PR to do that? If this PR will solve that problem, either: * Open an issue for it and tag this as solving it, or * Include a brief version of your diagnosis from the other issue, at the end of this PR's description Perfectly fine to justify this change as being cleaner and more correct, I agree with that. Just don't want to lose track of the motivating problem in case it comes back or others are looking for existing fixes for it. https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/179470 _______________________________________________ lldb-commits mailing list [email protected] https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits
