================
@@ -608,4 +608,16 @@ Interpreter::Visit(const BooleanLiteralNode *node) {
return ValueObject::CreateValueObjectFromBool(m_target, value, "result");
}
+llvm::Expected<lldb::ValueObjectSP>
+Interpreter::Visit(const CStyleCastNode *node) {
+ auto operand_or_err = Evaluate(node->GetOperand());
+ if (!operand_or_err)
+ return operand_or_err;
+
+ lldb::ValueObjectSP operand = *operand_or_err;
+ // Don't actually do the cast for now -- that code will be added later.
+ // For now just return the original operand, unchanged.
+ return operand;
----------------
cmtice wrote:
Yes we plan to merge it separately. I don't think we need to advertise that it
doesn't work properly yet (since we're not advertising that this feature is
going in at all). So I'm ok with 'type casting' silently doing nothing for
now. But if others disagree I could return an error here for now...
Other opinions?
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/165199
_______________________________________________
lldb-commits mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits
