================
@@ -3,10 +3,13 @@
(* This is currently a subset of the final DIL Language, matching the current
DIL implementation. *)
-expression = unary_expression ;
+expression = cast_expression;
+
+cast_expression = unary_expression
+ | "(" type_id ")" cast_expression;
unary_expression = postfix_expression
- | unary_operator expression ;
+ | unary_operator cast_expression ;
----------------
cmtice wrote:
In the currently shown grammar yes. But the full grammar for the full DIL
expression language has quite a few layers between "expression" and
"cast_expression", and I don't think it would be correct to allow some of them
here. So I would prefer to keep this as is at the moment, in anticipation of
future changes. But I can make your suggested change if you feel strongly about
it.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/165199
_______________________________________________
lldb-commits mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits
