================
@@ -74,24 +74,48 @@ struct DemangledNameInfo {
return BasenameRange.second > BasenameRange.first;
}
+ /// Returns \c true if `BasenameRange` is empty.
+ bool isBasenameEmpty() const {
+ return BasenameRange.first == BasenameRange.second;
----------------
Michael137 wrote:
Thanks for adjusting. Mostly looks good now
Though I don't think `hasBasename` should allow for `start == end`. That's the
one range that all `DemangledInfo` objects need to have to be considered valid.
Could we keep that as `end > start`? I don't think that should break anything
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/144731
_______________________________________________
lldb-commits mailing list
lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits
