Michael137 wrote: > Maybe we should say that if the name is not mangled, the entire string is the > name of the function (and so it should be highlighted)?
That could work. Just need to audit in which cases we might set a demangled name without specifying it's mangled name too. If the demangled name happens to include arguments/return types/etc., highlighting those may get confusing. But not sure that ever happens https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/137301 _______________________________________________ lldb-commits mailing list lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits
