Michael137 wrote: > Yeah, getting some numbers would be nice. Maybe just repeating the benchmark > in that diff. It might be a good idea to do it with and without the > accelerator tables, just to rule out any effect from those.
Will do On Darwin (without accelerator tables and statically linked Clang) I don't see this codepath being hit at all when setting a named breakpoint. If the function name doesn't exist we don't seem to call `CxxMethodName` at all. If the name does exist we hit it a couple of times (~10). I'll try on Linux too https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/137072 _______________________________________________ lldb-commits mailing list lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits
