================
@@ -174,6 +175,9 @@ int main(int argc, char **argv) {
//% self.expect("expr (new struct C[1]); side_effect", endstr=" = 4\n")
//% self.expect("expr delete c2; side_effect", endstr=" = 1\n")
//% self.expect("expr delete[] c3; side_effect", endstr=" = 2\n")
+ //% self.expect("image lookup -n operator()", substrs=["C::operator()(int)"])
----------------
Michael137 wrote:
Yea it was deducing that `operator` is the basename because it just does a
simple search for `()` and then checks whether the rest of the name looks like
a valid function identifier.
> Could you also add this to the unit tests in
> unittests/Language/CPlusPlus/CPlusPlusLanguageTest.cpp
Yup!
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/137072
_______________________________________________
lldb-commits mailing list
lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits
