JDevlieghere wrote: Reading the description, it seems like the third option would be the right one:
``` 3. Improve the run lock. This is a synchronize issue where process was in the middle of resuming while lldb-dap attempts to interrupt it. ``` and this patch is working around that while and breaking existing behavior in the process. What would it take to go with (3)? https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/134339 _______________________________________________ lldb-commits mailing list lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits
