yuvald-sweet-security wrote: > @yuvald-sweet-security
Thanks. This patch means we're still ignoring the arg0 set by `SetArg0`, right? and just using whatever was in the standard `GetArguments` vector. Maybe it's worth updating the comment I pointed at (https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/blob/b231f6f86237fc1a15377b4aad6cf9be4808d727/lldb/include/lldb/Utility/ProcessInfo.h#L122-L125) so that this is less confusing? https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/133093 _______________________________________________ lldb-commits mailing list lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits
