DavidSpickett wrote: > So I assume the build error here is not that NT_LOONGARCH_HW_BREAK is not > defined, it's that user_watch_state got redefined?
And if so, why are you adding a redefinition of it? This would only help if you are building lldb against kernel headers from before a time where the kernel had hardware watchpoint support. Which could be a valid use case, I'm not sure. But is that in fact the use case here? https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/126020 _______________________________________________ lldb-commits mailing list lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits
