rocallahan wrote: > I still feel like it would be better to have a way to ask up front if the > process supports reverse continue and shortcut attempts to do so as early as > possible (e.g. if you ask a command to reverse continue and the process > doesn't support it, we should return with an error right away and not do any > more work.) But if you really feel that this will over-complicate the design, > I'll be content with expressing my sentiments this one more time...
I don't have strong feelings about it. I made my case, you still prefer an early check, so I've implemented it. I added it as an extra commit so you can make sure it's what you had in mind. https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/112079 _______________________________________________ lldb-commits mailing list lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits
