================
@@ -23,6 +23,13 @@ STRING_EXTENSION_OUTSIDE(SBValue)
if -count <= key < count:
key %= count
return self.sbvalue.GetChildAtIndex(key)
+ elif isinstance(key, str):
+ if child := self.sbvalue.GetChildMemberWithName(key):
+ return child
+ # Support base classes, which are children but not members.
+ for child in self.sbvalue:
+ if child.name == key:
+ return child
----------------
kastiglione wrote:
I agree with your opinions. I think I'd like to avoid introducing complexities
in interface/consistency.
Should I change this PR to introduce a new `member` property? Or should
`value.child[name]` be documented as meaning only
`value.GetChildMemberWithName(name)`? cc @jimingham
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/118814
_______________________________________________
lldb-commits mailing list
lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits
