================
@@ -23,6 +23,13 @@ STRING_EXTENSION_OUTSIDE(SBValue)
if -count <= key < count:
key %= count
return self.sbvalue.GetChildAtIndex(key)
+ elif isinstance(key, str):
+ if child := self.sbvalue.GetChildMemberWithName(key):
+ return child
+ # Support base classes, which are children but not members.
+ for child in self.sbvalue:
+ if child.name == key:
+ return child
----------------
labath wrote:
I don't think this is a good idea, as it means every negative lookup could end
up enumerating all children of the object -- and there could be millions of
them. If you really want to support looking up base classes (*), I think it
should be done by iterating through the base base classes.
* I actually think we shouldn't be providing extra functionality here -- at
least unless GetChildMemberWithName supports that as well. I think the fact
that `operator[](string)` is shorthand for `GetChildMemberWithName(string)`
makes things easy to understand. I think it'd be confusing if one of them
provided functionality which is not available in the other one. You'd also have
to be very careful about handling data formatters -- they can provide synthetic
children, but not "synthetic base classes".
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/118814
_______________________________________________
lldb-commits mailing list
lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits
