dwblaikie wrote: > Just noticed that this breaks > `llvm/test/tools/dsymutil/X86/DWARFLinkerParallel/odr-string.test` because > for `DW_TAG_typedef`, llvm-dwarfdump will print the fully qualified name > instead of the base name in DW_AT_type that refers to > it([here](https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/blob/33124910c9f4877c069c0358159763c03e10ca31/llvm/lib/DebugInfo/DWARF/DWARFDie.cpp#L199-L205)). > Do you think we should keep the original bahavior by using the base name of > typedef? Or update the test to accept fully qualified name?
@JDevlieghere can probably speak more to that, but sounds very golden-file-y & can probably be updated. I take it it's this part of the test? ``` CHECK:DW_TAG_reference_type CHECK: 0x[[CONST_STR_REF:[0-9a-f]*]]: DW_TAG_reference_type{{.*[[:space:]].*}}DW_AT_type{{.*}}0x[[CONST_STRING:[0-9a-f]*]] "const string" CHECK:DW_TAG_const_type CHECK: 0x[[CONST_STRING]]: DW_TAG_const_type{{.*[[:space:]].*}}DW_AT_type{{.*}}0x[[STRING]] "string" ``` Where those names go from "const string" to "const std::__1::string" (and from "string" to "std::__1::string")? or something like that. https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/117239 _______________________________________________ lldb-commits mailing list lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits