ldrumm added inline comments.

================
Comment at: 
source/Plugins/ExpressionParser/Clang/ClangExpressionParser.cpp:559-560
@@ -558,5 +558,4 @@
 
-static bool FindFunctionInModule (ConstString &mangled_name,
-                                  llvm::Module *module,
-                                  const char *orig_name)
+static bool
+FindFunctionInModule(ConstString &mangled_name, llvm::Module *module, const 
char *orig_name)
 {
----------------
jingham wrote:
> Don't make this kind of change, please.  As long as the arguments fit in 120 
> characters we don't have a rule one way or the other about how to write 
> argument lists like this.  But changing them just because they look better to 
> you results in unnecessary churn.  Moreover, this is changing it away from 
> the way all the other functions in this source file are written, so it ends 
> up looking odd.
This change is made by clang-fomat using the rules in the lldb .clang-format 
file.

I'm willing to revert this part of the commit, but seeing as this change is 
essentially a refactoring of the whole method, it feels natural to also format 
the prototype while I’m at it.


http://reviews.llvm.org/D17274



_______________________________________________
lldb-commits mailing list
lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org
http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits

Reply via email to