jingham added a subscriber: jingham.
jingham added a comment.
I agree with Zachary. Just because a test found a bug that wasn't essential to
the test doesn't mean we should "fix" the test by silencing the part of the
test that uncovered the bug.
This test puts a breakpoint on a 'puts("")' statement and steps over it. All
the variables should still be available at that point. So this is a real bug.
If really want to get this particular test working, then it would be okay to
add another test that uncovers the same bug but doesn't test the actual values,
xfail that and then delete the step here.
http://reviews.llvm.org/D16334
_______________________________________________
lldb-commits mailing list
lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org
http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits
