tberghammer added inline comments. ================ Comment at: source/Core/ArchSpec.cpp:859-870 @@ -853,1 +858,14 @@ + + // If this and other are both arm ArchSpecs and this ArchSpec is a generic "some kind of arm" + // spec but the other ArchSpec is a specific arm core, adopt the specific arm core. + if (GetTriple().getArch() == llvm::Triple::arm + && other.GetTriple().getArch() == llvm::Triple::arm + && IsCompatibleMatch (other) + && GetCore() == ArchSpec::eCore_arm_generic + && other.GetCore() != ArchSpec::eCore_arm_generic) + { + m_core = other.GetCore(); + CoreUpdated (true); + } + if (GetTriple().getEnvironment() == llvm::Triple::UnknownEnvironment) ---------------- I would like to see this part of the code to be replaced with something like this so we store the sub-architecture inside the triple and we don't have to special case arm (it is already done in llvm::Triple):
``` if (GetTriple().getSubArch() == llvm::Triple::NoSubArch) GetTriple().setSubArch(other.GetTriple().getSubArch()); ``` Repository: rL LLVM http://reviews.llvm.org/D13578 _______________________________________________ lldb-commits mailing list lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits