zturner added a comment. In http://reviews.llvm.org/D12888#247195, @amccarth wrote:
> > Instead of test/functionalities/minidump, I would probably call this > > test/functionalities/core-file/windows. > > > Hmm... > > There is talk of (eventually) debugging minidumps on other platforms. Also > some crash capture tools can make minidumps, even on Mac and Linux hosts. I > could imagine you might also want to be able to debug a core file from a > non-Windows host on a Windows host. So core-file/windows could end up being > confusing/misleading in the long run. > > How about > > test/functionalities/crash_files/core-files > > and > > test/functionalities/crash_files/mini-dumps > > ? Are the "mini dumps" you're referring to that can be created on a Mac or Linux host the same file format? I think we need some way to capture the distinction between the two file formats. All of the different formats have one thing in common though. They support *postmortem* debugging. So maybe it could be: test/functionalities/postmortem/elf test/functionalities/postmortem/windows I don't think having it be called "windows" precludes being able to use the functionality on non-windows hosts (provided we ever write a library that can process them on non-Windows), I just can't think of a better way to describe the format itself. http://reviews.llvm.org/D12888 _______________________________________________ lldb-commits mailing list lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits
