emaste added a comment. In http://reviews.llvm.org/D12899#247074, @zturner wrote:
> They're not really dependencies in the normal sense. They're not build dependencies, but they are dependencies in the sense that lldb-server is required for lldb to be usable in the normal use case. In my opinion I'd hope that "ninja lldb" is sufficient to build a usable lldb and that requires lldb-server. http://reviews.llvm.org/D12899 _______________________________________________ lldb-commits mailing list lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits
