tfiala added a comment. @emaste, I'm adding you because I have no idea what the state of the *BSD world is with regards to lldb-server. It looks like you might still use the native process bits so lldb-server might not be interesting over there. If it is, we can extend the "always add the lldb-server dependency to lldb" for the BSDs as well.
http://reviews.llvm.org/D12899 _______________________________________________ lldb-commits mailing list lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits
