Hi Jody -
thanks very much for your careful efforts ..
The utility of having a single "source of truth" for lines of code,
activity and some language profile, has slightly outweighed the
undesirable dynamic of a FOSS dot-org requiring a third-party service
constantly to understand its own projects. Personally, I feel OSGeo
should have this ability in-house, along with other methods, and not
rely so heavily on this one metric site. Certain project's measurements
are horribly wrong to this day, and inevitably carry bias of varying
kinds.
best regards from Berkeley
-Brian M Hamlin
On Wed, 5 Jul 2017 21:59:16 -0700, Jody Garnett
<jody.garn...@gmail.com> wrote:
I was looking
at https://www.openhub.net/p/geotools/analyses/latest/languages_summary today and noticed a distinct stairstep pattern every time the geotools project migrated repository CVS, SVN,
GIT.
This made the project appear at 2 million lines of code, rather than
one million.
I have removed the old repositories, making the project appear younger
than it is, but giving more accurate stats about what is there.
I am under the impression OSGeo Live enjoys these stats? feedback welcome.
--
Jody Garnett
-------------------------
_______________________________________________
Live-demo mailing list
Live-demo@lists.osgeo.org
https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/live-demo
http://live.osgeo.org
http://wiki.osgeo.org/wiki/Live_GIS_Disc
--
Brian M Hamlin
OSGeo California Chapter
blog.light42.com
_______________________________________________
Live-demo mailing list
Live-demo@lists.osgeo.org
https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/live-demo
http://live.osgeo.org
http://wiki.osgeo.org/wiki/Live_GIS_Disc
