On jeudi 1 juin 2017 05:57:38 CEST Cameron Shorter wrote: > Hi Evan, > > Yes, MetaCRS was a project gathering all the Proj4 projects together. > However, it appears that proj4 is the only project in that grouping > which is active? > > Hence my thoughts are that "MetaCRS" should be dropped from OSGeo-Live > as a concept and "Proj4" be used instead. It would be ok to say "Proj4 > has been translated into other languages, including proj4js, ..." > > Your thoughts are welcome.
Regarding what is listed currently in metacrs : - proj4js: no opinion - cs-map: no-opinion - geotiff/libgeotiff: heavily used underneath by GDAL in particular, mostly in maintaince mode, but can be treated as a technical dependency that doesn't require to be visible from users. - proj4j: no opinion - spatialreference.org: not maintained in years. http://epsg.io/ would be a possible replacement Agreed that metacrs is probably a bit too ... meta for folks exploring OSGeo-Live content, so it could make sense exposing proj.4 as a standalone project. -- Spatialys - Geospatial professional services http://www.spatialys.com
_______________________________________________ Live-demo mailing list [email protected] https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/live-demo http://live.osgeo.org http://wiki.osgeo.org/wiki/Live_GIS_Disc
