On 9/15/2013 1:31 PM, Jim Thompson wrote: > > On Sep 15, 2013, at 12:30 PM, Jim Pingle <[email protected]> wrote: > >> On 9/15/2013 1:17 PM, Adam Thompson wrote: >>> If we mix Quagga and BIRD, don't we wind up with fragmentation problems >>> very similar to what we have now? >> >> No because as far as I can see BIRD's binaries are bird, birdc, and >> birdcl. It doesn't have a dedicated daemon process for each type of routing. > > I want to like bird, I really do. > > But it’s Quagga that has gotten all the runtime in real networks, and > attention to its codebase lately.
I agree. From what I have done with Quagga on OSPF, it's been pretty straightforward and simple and tends to just work and work well. It isn't without its quirks, but I've never been sure if those are actually quirks in Quagga or the way we generate configurations for it. Jim _______________________________________________ List mailing list [email protected] http://lists.pfsense.org/mailman/listinfo/list
