On 9/15/2013 11:58 AM, Adam Thompson wrote: > Reading the release notes for 2.1 reminded me of something... shouldn't the > use of PBI packaging now automagically resolve the conflicts between > OpenBGPd/OpenOSPFd and Quagga?
Somewhat. The actual calls to the binaries in their respective packages use the links in /usr/local/(s)bin/ so they still conflict since the links from one PBI will clobber the links from another. If the packages were adjusted to call the binaries from their isolated PBI dirs, then it may be OK, though since the actual binary names are the same (e.g. bgpd) some things such as the service status may not reflect the right status. Jim _______________________________________________ List mailing list [email protected] http://lists.pfsense.org/mailman/listinfo/list
