On 08/02/16 22:37, Michael Ellerman wrote:
Looks like I missed this?
Should it still go in? Is it a fix? If so when did it break, and should it go
to stable?
It is a fix - I'm a bit hazy on the details now but IIRC, Daniel Axtens
and I encountered this when doing some cxl debugging, though I think we
decided not to tag this for stable since it was a secondary issue to the
primary bug we were looking for. It probably could go to stable though?
(Daniel - thoughts?)
The line in question was last touched in 4d4f577e4b5e, but it looks like
the behaviour wasn't right even before that.
Andrew
--
Andrew Donnellan Software Engineer, OzLabs
andrew.donnel...@au1.ibm.com Australia Development Lab, Canberra
+61 2 6201 8874 (work) IBM Australia Limited
_______________________________________________
Linuxppc-dev mailing list
Linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org
https://lists.ozlabs.org/listinfo/linuxppc-dev
