On Tue, Mar 08, 2016 at 06:42:56PM +1100, Andrew Donnellan wrote: >On 09/02/16 10:57, Andrew Donnellan wrote: >>It is a fix - I'm a bit hazy on the details now but IIRC, Daniel Axtens >>and I encountered this when doing some cxl debugging, though I think we >>decided not to tag this for stable since it was a secondary issue to the >>primary bug we were looking for. It probably could go to stable though? >>(Daniel - thoughts?) >> >>The line in question was last touched in 4d4f577e4b5e, but it looks like >>the behaviour wasn't right even before that. > >Ping :) > >I think this patch should still go in, I don't really care whether it goes to >stable or not. >
Andrew, I lost the context about this. If you need any helps like review, please ping me from IRC. Thanks, Gavin >-- >Andrew Donnellan Software Engineer, OzLabs >andrew.donnel...@au1.ibm.com Australia Development Lab, Canberra >+61 2 6201 8874 (work) IBM Australia Limited _______________________________________________ Linuxppc-dev mailing list Linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org https://lists.ozlabs.org/listinfo/linuxppc-dev
