Michael Ellerman <m...@ellerman.id.au> writes: > On Fri, 2015-11-27 at 15:45 +1100, Stewart Smith wrote: > >> Long ago, only in the lab, there was OPALv1 and OPALv2. Now there is >> just OPALv3, with nobody ever expecting anything on pre-OPALv3 to >> be cared about or supported by mainline kernels. >> >> So, let's remove FW_FEATURE_OPAL and instead use FW_FEATURE_OPALv3 >> exclusively. > > It would be less churn if we did the reverse, ie. removed v3 and just used > FW_FEATURE_OPAL. It would also read better as v3 is the one and only version > we > care about, so having it called out everywhere is superfluous. > > Or is there a good reason I missed?
excessive caution? I'll send a V2 patchset doing the reverse, leaving FW_FEATURE_OPAL. _______________________________________________ Linuxppc-dev mailing list Linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org https://lists.ozlabs.org/listinfo/linuxppc-dev
