On Fri, Nov 06, 2015 at 09:32:57AM +1100, Daniel Axtens wrote: >Gavin Shan <gws...@linux.vnet.ibm.com> writes: > >> Each PHB has one instance of "struct pci_controller_ops", which >> includes various callbacks called by PCI subsystem. In the definition >> of this struct, some callbacks have explicit names for its arguments, >> but the left don't have. >> >> This adds all explicit names of the arguments to the callbacks in >> "struct pci_controller_ops" so that the code looks consistent. > >Thank you very much for doing this - I should have done it the first >time I created pci_controller_ops. > >They all look good, with one nit-pick: > >> - void (*shutdown)(struct pci_controller *); >> + void (*shutdown)(struct pci_controller *hose); > >I think we're trying to move from hose to phb in new code. >
Nope, We don't have the movement as I explained in previous reply: hose for pci_controller while phb represents pnv_phb on PowerNV platform. >Once that is fixed: > Reviewed-by: Daniel Axtens <d...@axtens.net> > Thanks, Gavin > >> }; >> >> /* >> -- >> 2.1.0 >> >> -- >> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-pci" in >> the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org >> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html _______________________________________________ Linuxppc-dev mailing list Linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org https://lists.ozlabs.org/listinfo/linuxppc-dev
