On Thu, 2015-08-27 at 23:07 +1000, Alexey Kardashevskiy wrote: > On 08/27/2015 07:37 PM, Michael Ellerman wrote: > > On Thu, 2015-27-08 at 06:01:16 UTC, Alexey Kardashevskiy wrote: > >> "powerpc/iommu: Cleanup setting of DMA base/offset" expects that > > > > This should be: > > > > Commit e91c25111aa3 "powerpc/iommu: Cleanup setting of DMA base/offset" ... > > Is not this format for reverts (which this patch is not)?
No, it's for any time you reference a commit in a change log. > >> Makes sense to squash it to "powerpc/iommu: Cleanup setting of DMA > >> base/offset". > > > > We don't squash things that are already in next. > > imho this screams for rebase. There is no point in having broken patches in > non merged tree, rebase is a very cheap operation. You can scream all you like. Scott has already forked my next as the basis for his next, so if I rebased my tree we'd get duplicate copies of all of that, and conflicts everywhere. cheers _______________________________________________ Linuxppc-dev mailing list Linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org https://lists.ozlabs.org/listinfo/linuxppc-dev
