On Thu, Aug 06, 2015 at 06:24:38PM -0500, Scott Wood wrote: > On Thu, 2015-08-06 at 09:52 -0700, Brian Norris wrote: > > Who takes patches for drivers/memory/ again? I can take it via MTD if > > no one else steps up. > There's no maintainer listed. IIRC, when we previously discussed the patch > we both said that it could go via either of our trees. I'll take it via mine.
I recall the conversation. I was just confused (again) by there being no maintainer entry. Have at it. > > It's nothing new, but this patch continues the pattern of using a global > > pointer to the IFC device structure. Not pretty, but not worth holding > > this up over. > > It's not pretty, but I see little reason to come up with more complicated > infrastructure for the drivers finding each other given the low odds of ever > seeing a single-kernel system with more than one IFC. It's impossible with > current chips. If it ever does happen we can do something fancier. Yep, I figured as much. Brian _______________________________________________ Linuxppc-dev mailing list Linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org https://lists.ozlabs.org/listinfo/linuxppc-dev
