On Mon, 2015-08-03 at 19:14 +0800, Chenhui Zhao wrote:
> On Sat, Aug 1, 2015 at 8:45 AM, Scott Wood <scottw...@freescale.com>
> wrote:
> > On Fri, 2015-06-26 at 15:44 +0800, Yuantian.Tang@freescale.comwrote:
> > > +static void rcpm_v1_set_ip_power(bool enable, u32 *mask)
> > > +{
> > > + if (enable)
> > > + setbits32(&rcpm_v1_regs->ippdexpcr, *mask);
> > > + else
> > > + clrbits32(&rcpm_v1_regs->ippdexpcr, *mask);
> > > +}
> > > +
> > > +static void rcpm_v2_set_ip_power(bool enable, u32 *mask)
> > > +{
> > > + if (enable)
> > > + setbits32(&rcpm_v2_regs->ippdexpcr[0], *mask);
> > > + else
> > > + clrbits32(&rcpm_v2_regs->ippdexpcr[0], *mask);
> > > +}
> >
> > Why do these take "u32 *mask" instead of "u32 mask"?
> >
> > -Scott
>
> I think it can be used in the case where there are several mask values.
When would that be?
-Scott
_______________________________________________
Linuxppc-dev mailing list
Linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org
https://lists.ozlabs.org/listinfo/linuxppc-dev
