On Sat, Aug 1, 2015 at 8:45 AM, Scott Wood <scottw...@freescale.com> wrote:
On Fri, 2015-06-26 at 15:44 +0800, yuantian.t...@freescale.com wrote:+static void rcpm_v1_set_ip_power(bool enable, u32 *mask) +{ + if (enable) + setbits32(&rcpm_v1_regs->ippdexpcr, *mask); + else + clrbits32(&rcpm_v1_regs->ippdexpcr, *mask); +} + +static void rcpm_v2_set_ip_power(bool enable, u32 *mask) +{ + if (enable) + setbits32(&rcpm_v2_regs->ippdexpcr[0], *mask); + else + clrbits32(&rcpm_v2_regs->ippdexpcr[0], *mask); +}Why do these take "u32 *mask" instead of "u32 mask"? -Scott
I think it can be used in the case where there are several mask values. -Chenhui _______________________________________________ Linuxppc-dev mailing list Linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org https://lists.ozlabs.org/listinfo/linuxppc-dev
