Vaibhav Jain <vaib...@linux.vnet.ibm.com> writes: > rtc-opal driver provides support for rtc alarms via > timed-power-on(tpo). However some Power platforms like BML use a fake > rtc clock and don't support tpo. Such platforms are indicated by the > missing 'has-tpo' property in the device tree. > > Current implementation however enables callback for > rtc_class_ops.read/set alarm irrespective of the tpo support from the > platform. This results in a failed opal call when kernel tries to read > an existing alarms via opal_get_tpo_time during rtc device registration. > > This patch fixes this issue by setting opal_rtc_ops.read/set_alarm > callback pointers only when tpo is supported. > > Acked-by: Michael Neuling <mi...@neuling.org> > Acked-by: Neelesh Gupta <neele...@linux.vnet.ibm.com> > Signed-off-by: Vaibhav Jain <vaib...@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Acked-by: Stewart Smith <stew...@linux.vnet.ibm.com> FWIW I'm updating OPAL docs with this. The TPO calls aren't actually documented :( In future, it'd be great if there was an accompanying skiboot patch updating the documentation there too. _______________________________________________ Linuxppc-dev mailing list Linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org https://lists.ozlabs.org/listinfo/linuxppc-dev
