On Wed, 2015-04-15 at 06:07 -0500, Liberman Igal-B31950 wrote: > > > Regards, > Igal Liberman. > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Wood Scott-B07421 > > Sent: Tuesday, April 14, 2015 11:23 PM > > To: Liberman Igal-B31950 > > Cc: devicet...@vger.kernel.org; linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org > > Subject: Re: [PATCH] powerpc/dts: Update the core cluster PLL node(s) > > > > On Tue, 2015-04-14 at 15:21 -0500, Scott Wood wrote: > > > On Tue, 2015-04-14 at 12:55 +0300, Igal.Liberman wrote: > > > > From: Igal Liberman <igal.liber...@freescale.com> > > > > > > > > This patch replaces the following: > > > > https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/427664/ > > > > > > > > This patch is described by the following binding document update: > > > > https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/461150/ > > > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Igal Liberman <igal.liber...@freescale.com> > > > > --- > > > > arch/powerpc/boot/dts/fsl/qoriq-clockgen2.dtsi | 6 ++++-- > > > > 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) > > > > > > > > diff --git a/arch/powerpc/boot/dts/fsl/qoriq-clockgen2.dtsi > > > > b/arch/powerpc/boot/dts/fsl/qoriq-clockgen2.dtsi > > > > index 48e0b6e..7e1f074 100644 > > > > --- a/arch/powerpc/boot/dts/fsl/qoriq-clockgen2.dtsi > > > > +++ b/arch/powerpc/boot/dts/fsl/qoriq-clockgen2.dtsi > > > > @@ -49,14 +49,16 @@ global-utilities@e1000 { > > > > reg = <0x800 0x4>; > > > > compatible = "fsl,qoriq-core-pll-2.0"; > > > > clocks = <&sysclk>; > > > > - clock-output-names = "pll0", "pll0-div2", "pll0-div4"; > > > > + clock-output-names = "pll0", "pll0-div2", "pll0-div3", > > > > + "pll0-div4"; > > > > }; > > > > pll1: pll1@820 { > > > > #clock-cells = <1>; > > > > reg = <0x820 0x4>; > > > > compatible = "fsl,qoriq-core-pll-2.0"; > > > > clocks = <&sysclk>; > > > > - clock-output-names = "pll1", "pll1-div2", "pll1-div4"; > > > > + clock-output-names = "pll1", "pll1-div2", "pll1-div3", > > > > + "pll1-div4"; > > > > > > Wait, so if the driver implements the binding you submitted, you'll > > > break compatibility with these older device trees... > > > > > > I think we need to just accept the ugly count-the-clock-names approach > > > and document it. > > > > Is there any current 2.0 clock consumer that references pll-div4? > > > > I looked at T4240 for example, there's a mux node which adds pll-div4 option: > mux0: mux0@0 { > #clock-cells = <0>; > reg = <0x0 0x4>; > compatible = "fsl,qoriq-core-mux-2.0"; > clocks = <&pll0 0>, <&pll0 1>, <&pll0 2>, > <&pll1 0>, <&pll1 1>, <&pll1 2>, > <&pll2 0>, <&pll2 1>, <&pll2 2>; > clock-names = "pll0", "pll0-div2", "pll0-div4", > "pll1", "pll1-div2", "pll1-div4", > "pll2", "pll2-div2", "pll2-div4"; > clock-output-names = "cmux0"; > }; > > After this change <&pll0 2> will represent "pll0-div3" and not "pll0-div4".
So this needs to be updated to match -- and it confirms that existing device trees will be broken if you base the interpretation on compatible rather than the number of clock-output-names. -Scott _______________________________________________ Linuxppc-dev mailing list Linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org https://lists.ozlabs.org/listinfo/linuxppc-dev
