On Wed, Mar 25, 2015 at 07:55:41PM -0600, Alex Williamson wrote:
>On Thu, 2015-03-26 at 11:59 +1100, Gavin Shan wrote:
>> On Wed, Mar 25, 2015 at 06:46:28PM -0600, Alex Williamson wrote:
>> >On Thu, 2015-03-26 at 10:20 +1100, Gavin Shan wrote:
>> >> The set of constants for PE states defined in uapi/linux/vfio.h is
>> >> duplicated to uapi/asm/eeh.h. The patch removes the set from the
>> >> former.
>> >> 
>> >> Signed-off-by: Gavin Shan <gws...@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
>> >> ---
>> >>  include/uapi/linux/vfio.h | 5 -----
>> >>  1 file changed, 5 deletions(-)
>> >> 
>> >> diff --git a/include/uapi/linux/vfio.h b/include/uapi/linux/vfio.h
>> >> index d81c17f..3fd1e86 100644
>> >> --- a/include/uapi/linux/vfio.h
>> >> +++ b/include/uapi/linux/vfio.h
>> >> @@ -492,11 +492,6 @@ struct vfio_eeh_pe_op {
>> >>  #define VFIO_EEH_PE_UNFREEZE_IO          2       /* Enable IO for frozen 
>> >> PE   */
>> >>  #define VFIO_EEH_PE_UNFREEZE_DMA 3       /* Enable DMA for frozen PE  */
>> >>  #define VFIO_EEH_PE_GET_STATE            4       /* PE state retrieval   
>> >>      */
>> >> -#define  VFIO_EEH_PE_STATE_NORMAL        0       /* PE in functional 
>> >> state    */
>> >> -#define  VFIO_EEH_PE_STATE_RESET 1       /* PE reset in progress      */
>> >> -#define  VFIO_EEH_PE_STATE_STOPPED       2       /* Stopped DMA and IO   
>> >>      */
>> >> -#define  VFIO_EEH_PE_STATE_STOPPED_DMA   4       /* Stopped DMA only     
>> >>      */
>> >> -#define  VFIO_EEH_PE_STATE_UNAVAIL       5       /* State unavailable    
>> >>      */
>> >>  #define VFIO_EEH_PE_RESET_DEACTIVATE     5       /* Deassert PE reset    
>> >>      */
>> >>  #define VFIO_EEH_PE_RESET_HOT            6       /* Assert hot reset     
>> >>      */
>> >>  #define VFIO_EEH_PE_RESET_FUNDAMENTAL    7       /* Assert fundamental 
>> >> reset  */
>> >
>> >How do you know that nobody depends on these defines?  I thought the
>> >suggestion was to use the EEH_* defines for error injection, not to
>> >remove existing VFIO_EEH_* defines.  You could certainly redefine these
>> >in terms of EEH_* defines instead.  Thanks,
>> >
>> 
>> QEMU should be the first user to utilize the EEH capability exposed by
>> the host kernel, and I believe QEMU doesn't use those constants yet.
>> So it's right time to move those constants to uapi/asm/eeh.h. Once some
>> one starts to use them, it's impossible to do so.
>
>There are soon to be four kernel versions out there with these defines,
>you can't be sure that nobody has already or won't in the future do
>VFIO/EEH development on those kernels.  The defines need to stay IMHO.
>Thanks,
>

Right, it's the point to keep them. I'll simply drop PATCH[4/4] and
amend the commit log of PATCH[1/4] in next revision, which will be
sent out soon.

Thanks,
Gavin

>Alex
>

_______________________________________________
Linuxppc-dev mailing list
Linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org
https://lists.ozlabs.org/listinfo/linuxppc-dev

Reply via email to